U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
o Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
for the transition period from to
Commission File No. 000-28344
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
South Carolina |
|
57-1010751 |
|
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification) |
|
|
|
|
|
5455 Sunset Boulevard, Lexington, South Carolina 29072 | ||
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
(803) 951-2265 | ||
|
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) | ||
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:
2,839,860 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, were issued and outstanding as of July 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
12,678,312 |
|
$ |
9,391,494 |
|
|
Interest-bearing bank balances |
|
209,060 |
|
803,426 |
| ||
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
4,322,455 |
|
9,130,725 |
| ||
|
Investment securities - available for sale |
|
182,251,083 |
|
190,010,307 |
| ||
|
Investment securities - held to maturity (market value of $5,837,428 and $6,147,698 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively) |
|
5,726,558 |
|
6,015,745 |
| ||
|
Loans |
|
202,533,224 |
|
186,771,344 |
| ||
|
Less, allowance for loan losses |
|
2,668,412 |
|
2,763,988 |
| ||
|
Net loans |
|
199,864,812 |
|
184,007,356 |
| ||
|
Property, furniture and equipment - net |
|
14,363,035 |
|
14,313,090 |
| ||
|
Goodwill |
|
24,256,020 |
|
24,256,020 |
| ||
|
Intangible assets |
|
3,064,445 |
|
3,361,815 |
| ||
|
Other assets |
|
15,365,337 |
|
14,416,034 |
| ||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
462,101,117 |
|
$ |
455,706,012 |
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
54,242,520 |
|
$ |
49,519,816 |
|
|
NOW and money market accounts |
|
92,078,338 |
|
98,846,828 |
| ||
|
Savings |
|
32,047,258 |
|
35,370,267 |
| ||
|
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
|
99,823,198 |
|
100,629,304 |
| ||
|
Time deposits $100,000 and over |
|
57,848,419 |
|
52,698,069 |
| ||
|
Total deposits |
|
336,039,733 |
|
337,064,284 |
| ||
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
10,501,200 |
|
7,549,900 |
| ||
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
|
46,613,103 |
|
42,452,122 |
| ||
|
Long term debt |
|
15,464,000 |
|
15,464,000 |
| ||
|
Other borrowed money |
|
170,345 |
|
184,593 |
| ||
|
Other liabilities |
|
2,458,477 |
|
2,528,424 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities |
|
411,246,858 |
|
405,243,323 |
| ||
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 2,839,860 and 2,788,902 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
2,839,860 |
|
2,788,902 |
| ||
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
42,251,649 |
|
41,832,090 |
| ||
|
Retained earnings |
|
7,918,846 |
|
6,712,849 |
| ||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
(2,156,096 |
) |
(871,152 |
) | ||
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
|
50,854,259 |
|
50,462,689 |
| ||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
462,101,117 |
|
$ |
455,706,012 |
|
3
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
Six |
|
Six |
| ||
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
6,292,892 |
|
$ |
4,035,279 |
|
|
Investment securities |
|
3,686,323 |
|
1,043,437 |
| ||
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
106,570 |
|
79,239 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
23,015 |
|
846 |
| ||
|
Total interest income |
|
10,108,800 |
|
5,158,801 |
| ||
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Deposits |
|
2,452,690 |
|
1,061,112 |
| ||
|
Federal funds sold and securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
83,637 |
|
12,379 |
| ||
|
Other borrowed money |
|
1,143,133 |
|
55,410 |
| ||
|
Total interest expense |
|
3,679,460 |
|
1,128,901 |
| ||
|
Net interest income |
|
6,429,340 |
|
4,029,900 |
| ||
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
138,000 |
|
130,000 |
| ||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
6,291,340 |
|
3,899,900 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Deposit service charges |
|
586,459 |
|
396,275 |
| ||
|
Mortgage origination fees |
|
170,785 |
|
132,427 |
| ||
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
188,419 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Other |
|
424,312 |
|
272,594 |
| ||
|
Total non-interest income |
|
1,369,975 |
|
801,296 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
3,030,340 |
|
1,799,410 |
| ||
|
Occupancy |
|
372,376 |
|
207,867 |
| ||
|
Equipment |
|
651,067 |
|
445,399 |
| ||
|
Marketing and public relations |
|
171,164 |
|
180,774 |
| ||
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
297,371 |
|
89,057 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
1,130,878 |
|
683,440 |
| ||
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
5,653,196 |
|
3,405,947 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net income before tax |
|
2,008,119 |
|
1,295,249 |
| ||
|
Income taxes |
|
521,030 |
|
442,800 |
| ||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,487,089 |
|
$ |
852,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
4
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
Three |
|
Three |
| ||
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
3,278,256 |
|
$ |
2,033,487 |
|
|
Investment securities |
|
1,920,909 |
|
500,024 |
| ||
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
32,813 |
|
49,818 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
12,447 |
|
413 |
| ||
|
Total interest income |
|
5,244,425 |
|
2,583,742 |
| ||
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Deposits |
|
1,346,357 |
|
543,207 |
| ||
|
Federal funds sold and securities sold under agreement repurchase |
|
47,293 |
|
6,379 |
| ||
|
Other borrowed money |
|
591,215 |
|
27,709 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Total interest expense |
|
1,984,865 |
|
577,295 |
| ||
|
Net interest income |
|
3,259,560 |
|
2,006,447 |
| ||
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
72,000 |
|
64,000 |
| ||
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
3,187,560 |
|
1,942,447 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Deposit service charges |
|
304,426 |
|
207,222 |
| ||
|
Mortgage origination fees |
|
92,233 |
|
74,710 |
| ||
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
7,322 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Other |
|
226,691 |
|
141,609 |
| ||
|
Total non-interest income |
|
630,672 |
|
423,541 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
1,520,888 |
|
897,969 |
| ||
|
Occupancy |
|
187,070 |
|
106,892 |
| ||
|
Equipment |
|
321,484 |
|
221,660 |
| ||
|
Marketing and public relations |
|
83,535 |
|
82,448 |
| ||
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
148,686 |
|
44,529 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
606,346 |
|
353,059 |
| ||
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
2,868,009 |
|
1,706,557 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net income before tax |
|
950,223 |
|
659,431 |
| ||
|
Income taxes |
|
243,400 |
|
228,850 |
| ||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
706,823 |
|
$ |
430,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
5
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Six Months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
Issued |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Total |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
1,597,224 |
|
$ |
1,597,224 |
|
$ |
12,862,715 |
|
$ |
4,909,742 |
|
$ |
139,133 |
|
$ |
19,508,814 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852,449 |
|
|
|
852,449 |
| |||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss net of income tax benefit of $293,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544,250 |
) |
(544,250 |
) | |||||
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,199 |
| |||||
|
Cash dividend ($0.10 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,203 |
) |
|
|
(160,203 |
) | |||||
|
Options exercised |
|
13,962 |
|
13,962 |
|
106,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
120,414 |
| |||||
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
2,631 |
|
2,631 |
|
55,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
58,443 |
| |||||
|
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
|
1,613,817 |
|
$ |
1,613,817 |
|
$ |
13,024,979 |
|
$ |
5,601,988 |
|
$ |
(405,117 |
) |
$ |
19,835,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
2,788,902 |
|
$ |
2,788,902 |
|
$ |
41,832,090 |
|
$ |
6,712,849 |
|
$ |
(871,152 |
) |
$ |
50,462,689 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487,089 |
|
|
|
1,487,089 |
| |||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss net of income tax benefit of $625,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,162,472 |
) |
|
| |||||
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax of $65,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,472 |
) |
|
| |||||
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,284,944 |
) |
(1,284,944 |
) | |||||
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,145 |
| |||||
|
Dividends paid ($0.10 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281,092 |
) |
|
|
(281,092 |
) | |||||
|
Options exercised |
|
47,595 |
|
47,595 |
|
361,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
408,659 |
| |||||
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
3,363 |
|
3,363 |
|
58,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
61,858 |
| |||||
|
Balance, June 30, 2005 |
|
2,839,860 |
|
$ |
2,839,860 |
|
$ |
42,251,649 |
|
$ |
7,918,846 |
|
$ |
(2,156,096 |
) |
$ |
50,854,259 |
|
6
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
| ||
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,487,089 |
|
$ |
852,449 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Depreciation |
|
488,564 |
|
354,064 |
| ||
|
Premium amortization (discount accretion) |
|
(64,555 |
) |
45,067 |
| ||
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
138,000 |
|
130,000 |
| ||
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
297,370 |
|
89,057 |
| ||
|
Gain on sale of equipment |
|
— |
|
(19,937 |
) | ||
|
Gain on sale of securities |
|
(188,418 |
) |
|
| ||
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
(257,414 |
) |
(206,722 |
) | ||
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
(69,947 |
) |
(107,308 |
) | ||
|
Net cash provided in operating activities |
|
1,830,689 |
|
1,136,670 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Cash flows form investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
(48,284,585 |
) |
(23,792,590 |
) | ||
|
Maturity of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
15,057,001 |
|
19,092,332 |
| ||
|
Proceeds from sale of securities |
|
39,071,729 |
|
|
| ||
|
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
(50,000 |
) |
— |
| ||
|
Maturity of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
325,000 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Increase in loans |
|
(16,104,839 |
) |
(8,820,056 |
) | ||
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(538,509 |
) |
(1,284,725 |
) | ||
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
|
— |
|
22,000 |
| ||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(10,524,203 |
) |
(14,783,039 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Increase (decrease) in deposit accounts |
|
(1,024,551 |
) |
15,920,123 |
| ||
|
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
2,951,300 |
|
3,414,000 |
| ||
|
Increase (decrease) in other borrowings |
|
(14,248 |
) |
(103,343 |
) | ||
|
Advances from the FHLB |
|
5,480,000 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Repayment of Advances FHLB |
|
(1,004,230 |
) |
— |
| ||
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
408,659 |
|
120,414 |
| ||
|
Dividends paid |
|
(281,092 |
) |
(160,203 |
) | ||
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
|
61,858 |
|
58,443 |
| ||
|
Net cash provided from financing activities |
|
6,577,696 |
|
19,249,434 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(2,115,818 |
) |
5,603,065 |
| ||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
19,325,645 |
|
26,483,199 |
| ||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17,209,827 |
|
$ |
32,086,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Supplemental disclosure: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Interest |
|
$ |
3,101,763 |
|
$ |
1,078,177 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
$ |
437,268 |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,976,833 |
|
$ |
837,298 |
|
7
|
- |
|
Basis of Presentation | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, the consolidated statements of income, the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, and the consolidated statements of cash flows of First Community Corporation (“the company”), present fairly in all material respects the company’s financial position at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the company’s results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are presented in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. The information included in the company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB should be referred to in connection with these unaudited interim financial statements. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
Note 2 |
- |
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The following reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation: | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Numerator (Included in basic and diluted earnings per share) |
|
$ |
1,487,089 |
|
$ |
852,449 |
|
$ |
706,823 |
|
$ |
430,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
2,824,586 |
|
1,602,057 |
|
2,836,208 |
|
1,606,309 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Stock options - Treasury stock method |
|
134,329 |
|
76,101 |
|
129,528 |
|
75,128 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
2,958,915 |
|
1,678,158 |
|
2,965,736 |
|
1,681,437 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
The average market price used in calculating assumed number of shares |
|
$ |
19.38 |
|
$ |
22.61 |
|
$ |
18.99 |
|
$ |
22.26 |
|
|
8
|
Note 3 |
- |
|
Stock Based Compensation | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The company has a stock based compensation plans as of June 30, 2004. The accounting for the plan is based on Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. #25 (APB 25). Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the financial statements. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 “ Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” (SFAS 123) the company has elected to provide the disclosure-only option provided for by SFAS 123. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Three months ended |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
1,487,089 |
|
$ |
852,449 |
|
$ |
706,823 |
|
$ |
430,581 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Less: |
Stock based compensation using fair value method (net of tax) |
|
63,651 |
|
1,700 |
|
32,002 |
|
850 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
1,423,438 |
|
$ |
850,749 |
|
$ |
674,821 |
|
$ |
429,731 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.27 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
| |
Note 4 – Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) will require companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its financial statements. In addition, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) requires additional accounting and disclosure related to the income tax and cash flow effects resulting from share-based payment arrangements. SFAS No. 123(R) is effective beginning as of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The company has evaluated the impact of this pronouncement on net income based on options granted through June 30, 2005. It is estimated that the compensation expense recognized will have a net of income tax effect of approximately $80,000 in 2006, $49,000 in 2007 and $30,000 in 2008. This does not include the impact of any future grants.
Note 5 – Significant Contract
On June 28, 2005 the Bank entered into a construction contract to have a 27,000 square foot administrative center built for approximately $3.4 million. The administrative center will provide the needed space for deposit and loan operations as well as other administrative functions. The total cost including furniture and equipment is estimated to be $4.3 million.
9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
This Report contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors, which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risk and uncertainties include but are not limited to:
• significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries;
• changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;
• changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment;
• the level of allowance for loan loss;
• the rate of delinquencies and amounts of charge-offs;
• the rate of loan growth;
• adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;
• general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;
• changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;
• changes in technology;
• changes in monetary and tax policies;
• changes in securities markets; and
• other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
The following discussion describes the our results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as well as results for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and also analyzes our financial condition as of June 30, 2005 as compared to December 31, 2004. Like most community banks, we derive most of our income from interest we receive on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.
Of course, there are risks inherent in all loans, so we maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We establish and maintain this allowance by charging a provision for loan losses against our operating earnings. In the following section we have included a detailed discussion of this process.
10
In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other expenses we charge to our customers. We describe the various components of this noninterest income, as well as our noninterest expense, in the following discussion.
The following discussion and analysis also identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other statistical information also included in this report.
We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004, as filed in our annual report on Form 10-KSB.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
We believe the allowance for loan losses is the critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgment and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Some of the more critical judgments supporting the amount of our allowance for loan losses include judgments about the credit worthiness of borrowers, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, the assumptions about cash flow, determination of loss factors for estimating credit losses, the impact of current events, and conditions, and other factors impacting the level of probable inherent losses. Under different conditions or using different assumptions, the actual amount of credit losses incurred by us may be different from management’s estimates provided in our consolidated financial statements. Refer to the portion of this discussion that addresses our allowance for loan losses for a more complete discussion of our processes and methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses.
11
|
|
|
The company’s results for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2005 reflect the merger of First Community Corporation and the former DutchFork Bancshares, Inc. which closed on October 1, 2004. The merger was accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 “Business Combinations”. Periods prior to October 1, 2004 do not include the effect of the merger and, as a result, the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 does not reflect any results from the former DutchFork Bancshares. |
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
The company’s net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $1.5 million, or $.50 diluted earnings per share, as compared to $852,000, or $.51 diluted earnings per share, for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in net income is primarily due an increase in net interest income due to additional earning assets from the DutchFork merger as well as organic growth in the offices that existed prior to the merger. Average earning assets were $387.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $200.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in average earning assets resulted in an increase in net interest income of $2.4 million in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the first six months of 2004. In addition, non-interest income increased $569,000 in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the first six months of 2004 largely due to the addition of the former DutchFork Bancshares. In addition there were gains on the sale of securities available-for-sale in the amount of $188,000 in the first six months of 2005 and none during the same period of 2004. |
|
|
|
The table on page 21 shows yield and rate data for interest-bearing balance sheet components during the six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, along with average balances and the related interest income and interest expense amounts. |
|
|
|
Net interest income was $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This again was primarily due to the increase in the level of earning assets. The yield on earning assets increased by 9 basis points due to increasing rates during the first half of 2005 offset by a significant change in the mix of the portfolios. The investment portfolio represented 48.0% of the interest earning assets in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to 27.9% during the comparable period in 2004. This change in the mix of the earning asset portfolio is a result first of the size of the investment portfolio we acquired in the DutchFork merger and second of our restructuring of this investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2004 and during the first three months of 2005. The objective of the restructuring was to shorten the maturity and purchase investments that provided ongoing cash flow. Yields on loans are typically higher then yields on other types of earning assets and thus one of the company’s goals continues to be to grow the loan portfolio as a percentage of earning assets. It is believed that the restructuring of the investment portfolio provides the necessary cash flow to meet the objective of growing the loan portfolio. |
12
The yield on earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was 5.27% and 5.18%, respectively. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities during the first six months of 2005 was 2.12% as compared to 1.44% in the same period of 2004. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was a result of increasing interest rates during the first six months of 2005 as well as having larger percentage of borrowed funds as total of interest –bearing funding sources in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The net interest margin was 3.35% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to 4.04% during the six months ended June 30, 2004. On a fully taxable equivalent basis the net interest margin was 3.50% and 4.10% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
At June 30, 2005 the allowance for loan losses amounted to $2.7 million, or 1.32% of total loans, as compared to $2.8 million, or 1.48% of total loans, at December 31, 2004. The company’s provision for loan loss was $138,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to $130,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The provision was made based on management’s assessment of general loan loss risk and asset quality. The objective of management is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at approximately 1.1% to 1.5% of total loans. The allowance for loan losses represents an amount which we believe will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. Our judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on a number of assumptions about future events, which we believe to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove to be accurate. Our determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans, including consideration of factors such as the balance of impaired loans, the quality, mix, and size of our overall loan portfolio, economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the amount and quality of collateral securing the loans, our historical loan loss experience, and a review of specific problem loans. We also consider subjective issues such as changes in the lending policies and procedures, changes in the local/national economy, changes in volume or type of credits, changes in volume/severity of problem loans, quality of loan review and board of director oversight, concentrations of credit, and peer group comparisons. Periodically, we adjust the amount of the allowance based on changing circumstances. We charge recognized losses to the allowance and add subsequent recoveries back to the allowance for loan losses. There can be no assurance that charge-offs of loans in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any point in time or that provisions for loan losses will not be significant to a particular accounting period.
At June 30, 2005 the company had $74,000 in loans delinquent more than 90 days, and loans totaling $650,000 that were delinquent more than 30 days. The company had three loans in a nonaccrual status in the amount of $433,000 at June 30, 2005.
13
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
Six Month Ended June 30, |
| ||||
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
| ||
|
Average loans outstanding |
|
$ |
192,539 |
|
$ |
126,905 |
|
|
Loans outstanding at period end |
|
$ |
202,533 |
|
$ |
129,775 |
|
|
Non-performing assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
433 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
404 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
837 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Beginning balance of allowance |
|
$ |
2,764 |
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
|
Loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
1-4 family residential mortgage |
|
274 |
|
— |
| ||
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Commercial |
|
12 |
|
93 |
| ||
|
Installment & credit card |
|
28 |
|
2 |
| ||
|
Total loans charged-off |
|
314 |
|
95 |
| ||
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
1-4 family residential mortgage |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Home equity |
|
— |
|
— |
| ||
|
Commercial |
|
63 |
|
36 |
| ||
|
Installment & credit card |
|
12 |
|
6 |
| ||
|
Total recoveries |
|
80 |
|
42 |
| ||
|
Net loan charge offs |
|
234 |
|
53 |
| ||
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
138 |
|
130 |
| ||
|
Balance at period end |
|
$ |
2,668 |
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Net charge -offs to average loans |
|
0.12 |
% |
0.04 |
% | ||
|
Allowance as percent of total loans |
|
1.32 |
% |
1.37 |
% | ||
|
Non-performing assets as % of total assets |
|
0.18 |
% |
0.08 |
% | ||
|
Allowance as % of non-performing loans |
|
616.2 |
% |
933.0 |
% | ||
14
The following allocation of the allowance to specific components is not necessarily indicative of future losses or future allocations. The entire allowance is available to absorb losses in the portfolio.
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
Amount |
|
%
of |
|
Amount |
|
%
of |
| ||
|
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural |
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
10.3 |
% |
$ |
1,215 |
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Real Estate - Construction |
|
10 |
|
7.5 |
% |
13 |
|
4.3 |
% | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Commercial |
|
701 |
|
51.3 |
% |
780 |
|
51.8 |
% | ||
|
Residential |
|
249 |
|
17.4 |
% |
228 |
|
19.0 |
% | ||
|
Consumer |
|
163 |
|
13.5 |
% |
89 |
|
14.7 |
% | ||
|
Unallocated |
|
490 |
|
N/A |
|
439 |
|
N/A |
| ||
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,688 |
|
100.0 |
% |
$ |
2,764 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Accrual of interest is discontinued on loans when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts that a borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest is doubtful. A delinquent loan is generally placed in nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days or more past due. At the time a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest, which has been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain.
Non-interest Income and Expense
Non-interest income during the first six months of 2005 was $1.4 million as compared to $801,000 during the same period in 2004. The growth in non-interest income consisted of increases in deposit service charges of $190,000 and mortgage origination fees of $38,000. The increase in deposit service charges resulted from organic growth in deposit accounts as well as the growth resulting from the DutchFork merger. Mortgage origination fees increased due to the continued low rate environment as well as continued emphasis on this source of revenue. During the first six months of 2005 the company realized gains on the sale of securities in the amount of $188,000 with $181,000 realized in the first quarter of 2005. Subsequent to the merger with DutchFork, management began restructuring the combined investment portfolio. This restructuring continued into the first quarter of 2005. Although the portfolio acquired from DutchFork had a large percentage of investments with variable interest rates, the investments did not provide significant cash flow. The objective of the restructuring was to shorten the maturity and purchase investments that provide ongoing cash flow. Management will continue to take advantage of opportunities to restructure portions of the portfolio, but it is not anticipated that the volume of sales that the company experienced in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 will continue. Other income increased $152,000
15
during the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 primarily as a result of the merger with DutchFork in October 2004 and the inclusion of noninterest income for these three new offices. Included in other income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was a gain on the sale of equipment in the amount of $27,000.
Total non-interest expense increased by $2.2 million during the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period of 2004. The DutchFork acquisition added three new offices and approximately 32 additional employees. In addition, the bank opened a new banking office in April 2004 and February 2005. The increases in all non-interest expense categories are primarily a result of the merger as well as these de-novo branch expansions. Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.2 million in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. At June 30, 2005 the company had approximately 120 full time equivalent employees as compared to 78 full time equivalent employees at June 30, 2004. Occupancy expense increased $165,000 in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The three offices acquired in the merger and the two de-novo office expansions account for this increase. Equipment expense increased to $651,000 in the first six months of 2005 as compared to $445,000 in the first six months of 2004. This increase resulted from the additional equipment acquired as a result of the additional branches as well as upgrades to certain item processing hardware and software needed to process the higher volume of activity subsequent to the DutchFork merger. Expense related to amortization of intangibles increased from $89,000 in the first six months of 2004 to $297,000 in the comparable period in 2005. The core deposit intangible acquired in the DutchFork acquisition amounted to $2.9 million and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. The amortization in the first six months of 2004 relates to core deposit premium acquired in a branch acquisition in 2001. Prior core deposit premium is also amortized on a straight-line basis over seven years. There was a $447,000 increase in other expenses in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. All components of other expense increased due to the significant growth the company experienced as a result of the merger with DutchFork.
The following is a summary of the components of non-interest expense:
|
|
|
Six months ended |
| ||||
|
(In thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
| ||
|
Data processing |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
Supplies |
|
136 |
|
85 |
| ||
|
Telephone |
|
146 |
|
89 |
| ||
|
Correspondent services |
|
82 |
|
62 |
| ||
|
Insurance |
|
121 |
|
71 |
| ||
|
Postage |
|
73 |
|
48 |
| ||
|
Professional fees |
|
183 |
|
65 |
| ||
|
Other |
|
303 |
|
214 |
| ||
|
|
|
$ |
1,131 |
|
$ |
683 |
|
16
Comparison of Results of Operations for Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004:
Net income for the second quarter of 2005 was $707,000 ($0.24 per diluted share), as compared to $431,000 ($0.26 per diluted share) during the comparable period in 2004. Net interest income increased by $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $2.0 million in 2004 to $3.3 million in 2005 The increase in net interest income is primarily due to the addition of the former DutchFork Bancshares. Average earning assets were $388.3 million during the second quarter of 2005 as compared to $207.3 million during the second quarter of 2004. The table on page 22 shows yield and rate data for interest-bearing balance sheet components during the three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, along with average balances and the related interest income and interest expense amounts. The yield on average earning assets increased to 5.42% in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to 5.01% in the second quarter of 2004. The cost of interest bearing liabilities was 2.27% in second quarter of 2005 as compared to 1.42% in the second quarter of 2004.
Non-interest income increased by $207,000 from $424,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 to $631,000 in the same period of 2005. Deposit service charges increased by $97,000, mortgage loan fees increased by $18,000 and other income increased $85,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2005. As previously discussed, the addition of the three former DutchFork branches and the two de-novo branch expansions are the significant contributors to the increases in each of these non-interest income categories.
Total non-interest expense increased by $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the same quarter of 2004. This increase is the result of a $623,000 increase in salary and benefits expense, a $80,000 increase in occupancy expense, a $100,000 increase in equipment expense, a $104,000 increase in amortization of intangibles and a $253,000 increase in other expenses. All of these increases are primarily a result of the company’s merger with DutchFork Bancshares on October 1, 2004.
Financial Position
Assets totaled $462.1 million at June 30, 2005 as compared to $455.7 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $6.4 million, or 1.4%. At June 30, 2005, loans accounted for 51.3% of earning assets, as compared to 47.6% at December 31, 2004. Loans grew by $15.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $186.8 million at December 31, 2004 to $202.5 million at June 30, 2005. The loan to deposit ratio at June 30, 2005 was 60.3% as compared to 55.4% at December 31, 2004. In evaluating the merger with DutchFork, management considered the need to leverage the existing deposit base in the Newberry County market through quality growth of the loan portfolio. The growth of the loan portfolio both in total dollars and as a percentage of total earning assets will continue to be a major focus throughout 2005 and thereafter. It is anticipated that this ratio will continue to increase as management continues to emphasize investing more of its assets in the higher earning loan portfolio as compared to the investment portfolio. Deposits decreased $1.1 million from $337.1 million at December 31, 2004 to $336.0 million at June 30, 2005. Investments securities decreased $8.0 million from $196.0 million at December 31, 2004 to $188.0 million at June 30, 2005. The decrease in the portfolio was used to fund loan growth and reflects additional unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio resulting from rising interest rates. As previously discussed, during the first quarter of 2005, the company continued restructuring portions of the combined investment portfolio.
17
The following table shows the composition of the loan portfolio by category:
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||||
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Commercial, financial & agricultural |
|
$ |
20,815 |
|
10.3 |
% |
$ |
19,001 |
|
10.2 |
% |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Construction |
|
15,172 |
|
7.5 |
% |
8,066 |
|
4.3 |
% | ||
|
Mortgage – residential |
|
35,348 |
|
17.4 |
% |
35,438 |
|
19.0 |
% | ||
|
Mortgage – commercial |
|
103,884 |
|
51.3 |
% |
96,811 |
|
51.8 |
% | ||
|
Consumer |
|
27,314 |
|
13.5 |
% |
27,455 |
|
14.7 |
% | ||
|
Total gross loans |
|
202,533 |
|
100.0 |
% |
186,771 |
|
100.0 |
% | ||
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(2,668 |
) |
|
|
(2,764 |
) |
|
| ||
|
Total net loans |
|
$ |
199,865 |
|
|
|
$ |
184,007 |
|
|
|
In the context of this discussion, a real estate mortgage loan is defined as any loan, other than loans for construction purposes and advances on home equity lines of credit, secured by real estate, regardless of the purpose of the loan. Advances on home equity lines of credit are included in consumer loans. The company follows the common practice of financial institutions in the company’s market area of obtaining a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This collateral is taken to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan and tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan components. Generally the company limits the loan-to-value ratio to 80%.
Market Risk Management
The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving the company’s strategic financial objectives. The company’s most significant market risk is interest rate risk The company has established an Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) to monitor and manage interest rate risk. The ALCO monitors and manages the pricing and maturity of its assets and liabilities in order to diminish the potential adverse impact that changes in interest rates could have on its net interest income. The ALCO has established policy guidelines and strategies with respect to interest rate risk exposure and liquidity.
A monitoring technique employed by the ALCO is the measurement of the company’s interest sensitivity “gap,” which is the positive or negative dollar difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest rate repricing within a given period of time. Also, asset/liability simulation modeling is performed by the company to assess the impact varying interest rates and balance sheet mix assumptions will have on net interest income. Interest rate sensitivity can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, selling securities available-for-sale, replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Managing the amount of assets and liabilities repricing in the same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income of rising or falling interest rates. Neither the “gap” analysis nor asset/liability modeling is a precise indicator of the interest sensitivity position of the company due to the many factors that affect net interest income, including changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The company’s gap analysis indicates a slight liability sensitive position over the one year lives of the portfolio and a slightly asset sensitive position over two years. For a twelve month period, the gap analysis indicates a liability sensitive position as of June 30, 2005 of $3.3 million. Based on our modeling, this indicates that if interest rates increase the company would realize a modest decrease in net interest income over a twelve month
18
period and would benefit slightly over the following twelve to twenty-four month period. The company’s gap analysis and simulation modeling are not precise indicators of its interest sensitivity position. Net interest income is also impacted by other significant factors, including changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Through simulation modeling, management monitors the effect that an immediate and sustained change in interest rates of 100 basis points and 200 basis points up and down will have on net-interest income over the next twelve months.
Based on the many factors and assumptions used in simulating the effect of changes in interest rates, the following table estimates the percentage change in net interest income at March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 over the next twelve months.
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
|
Change |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
December |
|
|
+200bp |
|
- 0.98 |
% |
+ 1.76 |
% |
+.56 |
% |
|
+100bp |
|
- 0.22 |
% |
+ 1.05 |
% |
+ 0.96 |
% |
|
Flat |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
-100bp |
|
- 6.19 |
% |
- 4.31 |
% |
- 6.44 |
% |
|
-200bp |
|
- 13.33 |
% |
- 11.69 |
% |
- 14.33 |
% |
As a result of the size of the investment portfolio that was acquired in the DutchFork merger and the amount and type of fixed rate longer term investments that were in the portfolio, management has put a great deal of emphasis on restructuring the portfolio since October 1, 2004. The purpose was to shorten the average life of the portfolio and acquire investments that provided cash flow and/or were adjustable rate instruments. Although this resulted in a reduction in investment yield, management believes that the restructuring positions the bank more appropriately for interest rate volatility and provides a significant amount of additional cash flow to fund desired loan growth.
The company also performs a valuation analysis projecting future cash flows from assets and liabilities to determine the Present Value of Equity (PVE) over a range of changes in market interest rates. The sensitivity of PVE to changes in interest rates is a measure of the sensitivity of earnings over a longer time horizon. At June 30, 2005 the PVE exposure in a plus 200 basis point increase in market interest rates was estimated to be 8.64% as compared to 6.4% at March 31, 2005 and 6.5% at December 31, 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The company’s liquidity remains adequate to meet operating and loan funding requirements. Federal funds sold and investment securities available-for-sale represented 40.4% of total assets at June 30, 2004. Management believes that the company’s existing stable base of core deposits along with continued growth in this deposit base will enable the company to meet its long-term and short-term liquidity needs successfully. These needs include the ability to respond to short-term demand for funds caused by the withdrawal of deposits, maturity of repurchase agreements, extensions of credit and for the payment of operating expenses. Sources of liquidity in addition to deposit gathering activities include maturing loans
19
and investments, purchase of federal funds from other financial institutions and selling securities under agreements to repurchase. The company monitors closely the level of large certificates of deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more as they tend to be more sensitive to interest rate levels, and thus less reliable sources of funding for liquidity purposes. At June 30, 2005, the amount of certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more represented 17.2% of total deposits. These deposits are issued to local customers, many of which have other product relationships with the bank and none are brokered deposits. Through the operations of our bank, we have made contractual commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of our business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to lend money to our customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. At June 30, 2005, we had issued commitments to extend credit of $43.5 million, including $18.0 million in unused home equity lines of credit, through various types of lending arrangements. We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial and residential real estate. We manage the credit risk on these commitments by subjecting them to normal underwriting and risk management processes.
Management is not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that may result in a significant adverse effect on the company’s liquidity position. However, no assurances can be given in this regard, as rapid growth, deterioration in loan quality, and poor earnings, or a combination of these factors, could change the company’s liquidity position in a relatively short period of time.
With the successful completion of the common stock offering in 1995, the secondary offering completed in 1998, the trust preferred offering completed in September 2004, our the acquisition of DutchFork in October 2004, the company has maintained a high level of liquidity and adequate capital, along with continued retained earnings, sufficient to fund the operations of the bank for at least the next 12 months. The company’s management anticipates that the bank will remain a well capitalized institution for at least the next 12 months. Shareholders’ equity was 11.0% of total assets at June 30, 2005 and 11.1% at December 31, 2004. The bank’s risked-based capital ratios of Tier 1, total capital and leverage ratio were 11.9%, 12.8% and 8.1%, respectively at June 30, 2005 as compared to 11.5%, 12.4% and 7.6%, respectively at December 31, 2004. The company’s risked-based capital ratios of Tier 1, total capital and leverage ratio were 13.5%, 14.4% and 9.1% respectively at June 30, 2005 as compared to 12.9%, 13.9% and 8.5%, respectively at December 31, 2004. This compares to required OCC and Federal Reserve regulatory capital guidelines for Tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage capital ratios of 4.0%, 8.0% and 4.0%, respectively.
20
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION
Yields on Average Earning Assets and Rates on Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2004 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
| ||||
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Earned/Paid |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Earned/Paid |
|
Rate |
| ||||
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Loans |
|
$ |
192,538,980 |
|
$ |
6,292,892 |
|
6.59 |
% |
$ |
126,904,949 |
|
$ |
4,035,279 |
|
6.39 |
% |
|
Securities: |
|
185,795,479 |
|
3,686,323 |
|
4.00 |
% |
55,982,841 |
|
1,043,437 |
|
3.75 |
% | ||||
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
8,835,165 |
|
129,585 |
|
2.96 |
% |
17,565,043 |
|
80,085 |
|
0.92 |
% | ||||
|
Total earning assets |
|
387,169,624 |
|
10,108,800 |
|
5.27 |
% |
200,452,833 |
|
5,158,801 |
|
5.18 |
% | ||||
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
11,664,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,222,335 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Premises and equipment |
|
14,422,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,443,928 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other assets |
|
42,521,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,289,519 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(2,838,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,777,994 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
452,938,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216,630,621 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
55,412,190 |
|
82,529 |
|
0.30 |
% |
$ |
29,611,414 |
|
43,729 |
|
0.30 |
% | ||
|
Money market accounts |
|
40,275,276 |
|
301,558 |
|
1.51 |
% |
23,476,193 |
|
95,389 |
|
0.82 |
% | ||||
|
Savings deposits |
|
32,621,533 |
|
105,273 |
|
0.65 |
% |
14,104,778 |
|
44,299 |
|
0.63 |
% | ||||
|
Time deposits |
|
155,651,920 |
|
1,963,330 |
|
2.54 |
% |
80,348,247 |
|
877,695 |
|
2.20 |
% | ||||
|
Other borrowings |
|
66,572,956 |
|
1,226,770 |
|
3.72 |
% |
10,037,462 |
|
67,789 |
|
1.36 |
% | ||||
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
350,533,875 |
|
3,679,460 |
|
2.12 |
% |
157,578,094 |
|
1,128,901 |
|
1.44 |
% | ||||
|
Demand deposits |
|
49,945,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,099,980 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other liabilities |
|
2,146,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,062,122 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Shareholders’ equity |
|
50,312,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,890,425 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
452,938,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216,630,621 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.74 |
% | ||||
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
|
|
$ |
6,429,340 |
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
$ |
4,029,900 |
|
4.04 |
% | ||
|
Net interest income/margin FTE basis |
|
|
|
$ |
6,712,664 |
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
$ |
4,074,900 |
|
4.10 |
% | ||
21
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2004 |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/ |
| ||||
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Earned/Paid |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Earned/Paid |
|
Rate |
| ||||
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Loans |
|
$ |
196,374,470 |
|
$ |
3,278,256 |
|
6.70 |
% |
$ |
129,426,633 |
|
$ |
2,033,487 |
|
6.32 |
% |
|
Securities: |
|
186,889,118 |
|
1,920,909 |
|
4.12 |
% |
55,814,420 |
|
500,024 |
|
3.60 |
% | ||||
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
5,022,885 |
|
45,260 |
|
3.61 |
% |
22,089,313 |
|
50,231 |
|
0.91 |
% | ||||
|
Total earning assets |
|
388,286,473 |
|
5,244,425 |
|
5.42 |
% |
207,330,366 |
|
2,583,742 |
|
5.01 |
% | ||||
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
11,579,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,815,923 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Premises and equipment |
|
14,392,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,678,787 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other assets |
|
42,911,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,385,704 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(2,879,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,820,267 |
) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
454,290,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
224,390,513 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
54,340,500 |
|
41,904 |
|
0.31 |
% |
$ |
30,610,532 |
|
21,228 |
|
0.28 |
% | ||
|
Money market accounts |
|
40,851,226 |
|
164,433 |
|
1.61 |
% |
24,717,778 |
|
50,259 |
|
0.82 |
% | ||||
|
Savings deposits |
|
32,718,400 |
|
53,170 |
|
0.65 |
% |
16,050,012 |
|
25,474 |
|
0.64 |
% | ||||
|
Time deposits |
|
156,273,279 |
|
1,086,849 |
|
2.79 |
% |
81,418,583 |
|
446,246 |
|
2.20 |
% | ||||
|
Other borrowings |
|
66,620,141 |
|
638,508 |
|
3.84 |
% |
10,145,085 |
|
34,088 |
|
1.35 |
% | ||||
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
350,803,546 |
|
1,984,864 |
|
2.27 |
% |
162,941,990 |
|
577,295 |
|
1.42 |
% | ||||
|
Demand deposits |
|
51,046,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,414,647 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Other liabilities |
|
2,431,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,055,606 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Shareholders’ equity |
|
50,008,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,978,270 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
454,290,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
224,390,513 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.59 |
% | ||||
|
Net interest income/margin |
|
|
|
$ |
3,259,561 |
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
$ |
2,006,447 |
|
3.89 |
% | ||
|
Net interest income/margin FTE basis |
|
|
|
$ |
3,396,706 |
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
$ |
2,030,447 |
|
3.90 |
% | ||
22
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of June 30, 2005. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
OTHER INFORMATION
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the company or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not Applicable
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
23
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were two matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended June 30, 2005 at our annual meeting of shareholders held on May 18, 2005.
Proposal #1 - Election of five Class II directors to serve on the board of directors each for three-year terms
The following five individuals were elected to serve on the board of directors for three-year terms.
|
|
|
VOTES |
| ||
|
|
|
For |
|
Against/Withheld |
|
|
Thomas C. Brown |
|
2,276,957 |
|
20,862 |
|
|
O.A. Ethridge, DMD |
|
2,276,320 |
|
21,499 |
|
|
W. James Kitchens, Jr. |
|
2,274,989 |
|
22,830 |
|
|
Mitchell M. Willoughby |
|
2,276,957 |
|
20,862 |
|
|
Steve P. Sligh |
|
2,276,230 |
|
21,589 |
|
Proposal #2 - Election of two Class III directors to serve on the board of directors each for a one-year term
The following two individuals were elected to serve on the board of directors each for a one-year term.
|
|
|
VOTES |
| ||
|
|
|
For |
|
Against/Withheld |
|
|
J. Thomas Johnson |
|
2,276,493 |
|
21,326 |
|
|
Alexander Snipes, Jr. |
|
2,282,557 |
|
15,262 |
|
The terms of the following eight directors continued after the meeting.
|
Richard K. Bogan, MD |
|
George H. Fann, DMD |
|
Chimin J. Chao |
|
James C. Leventis |
|
Michael C. Crapps |
|
Loretta R. Whitehead |
|
Hinton G. Davis |
|
Anita B. Easter |
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
10.1 Agreement between First Community Bank and Summerfield Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2005.
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer.
24
32 Section 1350 Certifications.
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
FIRST COMMUNITY CORPORATION |
| |||||
|
|
|
(REGISTRANT) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
Date: |
August 12, 2005 |
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael C. Crapps |
| |
|
|
|
Michael C. Crapps | |||||
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph G. Sawyer |
| |||
|
|
|
Joseph G. Sawyer | |||||
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Principal
Financial | |||||
25
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Agreement between First Community Bank and Summerfield Associates, Inc. dated June 28, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Section 1350 Certifications. |
Exhibit 10.1
AIA® Document A101™ — 1997
Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor
where the basis of payment is a STIPULATED SUM
AGREEMENT made as of the 28th day of June in the year of 2005
(In words indicate day, month and year)
|
BETWEEN the Owner: |
|
|
|
(Name, address and other information) |
|
This document has important legal consequences. Consultation with an attorney is |
|
First Community Bank |
|
encouraged with respect to its completion or |
|
P.O. Box 64 |
|
modification. |
|
Lexington, SC 290271 |
|
|
|
|
|
AIA Document A201-1997, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other general conditions unless this document is modified. |
|
|
|
|
|
Summerfield Associates, Inc. |
|
This document has been approved and endorsed |
|
P.O. Box 5815 |
|
by The Associated General Contractors of |
|
West Columbia, SC 29171 |
|
America. |
The Project is:
(Name and location)
First Community Bank
Administration Center
5455 Sunset Blvd.
Lexington, SC 29072
The Architect is:
(Name, address and other information)
JHS Architecture: Integrated Design
1812 Lincoln Street, Suite 300
Columbia, SC 29201
The Owner and Contractor agree as follows.
AIA Document A101™-1997. Copyright © 1915, 1918, 1925, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1961, 1963, 1967, 1974, 1977, 1980, 1987, 1991 and 1997 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. Purchasers are permitted to reproduce ten (10) copies of this document when completed. To report copyright violations of AIA Contract Documents, e-mail The American Institute of Architects’ legal counsel copyright@aia.org.
1
ARTICLE 1 THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement, Conditions of the Contract (General, Supplementary and other Conditions), Drawings, Specifications, Addenda issued prior to execution of this Agreement, other documents listed in this Agreement and Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement; these form the Contract, and are as fully a part of the Contract as if attached to this Agreement or repeated herein. The Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. An enumeration of the Contract Documents, other than Modifications, appears in Article 8.
ARTICLE 2 THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT
The Contractor shall fully execute the Work described in the Contract Documents, except to the extent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of others.
ARTICLE 3 DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
§ 3.1 The date of commencement of the Work shall be the date of this Agreement unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fixed in a notice to proceed issued by the Owner.
(Insert the date of commencement if it differs from the date of this Agreement or, if applicable, state that the date will be fixed in a notice to proceed.)
July 11, 2005 or upon receipt of building permit (whichever is later)
If, prior to the commencement of the Work, the Owner requires time to file mortgages, mechanic’s liens and other security interests, the Owner’s time requirement shall be as follows:
§ 3.2 The Contract Time shall be measured from the date of commencement.
§ 3.3 The Contractor shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work not later than days from the date of commencement, or as follows:
(Insert number of calendar days. Alternatively, a calendar date may be used when coordinated with the date of commencement. Unless stated elsewhere in the Contract Documents, insert any requirements for earlier Substantial Completion of certain portions of the Work)
303 Calendar Days
, subject to adjustments of this Contract Time as provided in the Contract Documents.
(Insert provisions, if any, for liquidated damages relating to failure to complete on time or for bonus payments for early completion of the Work.)
ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT SUM
§ 4.1 The Owner shall pay the Contractor the Contract Sum in current funds for the Contractor’s performance of the Contract. The Contract Sum shall be Three million Three hundred ninety four thousand two hundred twenty two dollars ($3,394,222.00), subject to additions and deductions as provided in the Contract Documents.
§ 4.2 The Contract Sum is based upon the following alternates, if any, which are described in the Contract Documents and are hereby accepted by the Owner:
(State the numbers or other identification of accepted alternates. If decisions on other alternates are to be made by
2
the Owner subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, attach a schedule of such other alternates showing time amount for each and the date when that amount expires)
Copy of Summerfield Associates, Inc. quote dated June 27, 2005.
§ 4.3 Unit prices, if any, are as follows:
None
ARTICLE 5 PAYMENTS
§ 5.1 PROGRESS PAYMENTS
§ 5.1.1 Based upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Certificates for Payment issued by the Architect, the Owner shall make progress payments on account of the Contract Sum to the Contractor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents.
§ 5.1.2 The period covered by each Application for Payment shall be one calendar month ending on the last day of the month, or as follows:
§ 5.1.3 Provided that an Application for Payment is received by the Architect not later than the 25th day of a month, the Owner shall make payment to the Contractor not later than the 15th day of the month. If an Application for Payment is received by the Architect after the application date fixed above, payment shall be made by the Owner not later than ( ) days after the Architect receives the Application for Payment.
§ 5.1.4 Each Application for Payment shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract Documents. The schedule of values shall allocate the entire Contract Sum among the various portions of the Work. The schedule of values shall be prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Architect may require. This schedule, unless objected to by the Architect, shall be used as a basis for reviewing the Contractor’s Applications for Payment.
§ 5.1.5 Applications for Payment shall indicate the percentage of completion o each portion of the Work as of the end of the period covered by the Application for Payment.
§ 5.1.6 Subject to other provisions of the Contract Documents, the amount of each progress payment shall be computed as follows:
.1 Take that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to completed Work as determined by multiplying the percentage completion of each portion of the Work by the share of the Contract Sum allocated to that
3
portion of the Work in the schedule of values, less retainage of ten percent (10%). Pending final determination of cost to the Owner of changes in the Work, amounts not in dispute shall be included as provided in Section 7.3.8 of AIA Document A201-1997;
.2 Add that portion of the Contract Sum properly allocable to materials and equipment delivered and suitably stored at the site for subsequent incorporation in the completed construction (or, if approved in advance by the Owner, suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of percent (10%);
.3 Subtract the aggregate of previous payments made by the Owner; and
.4 Subtract amounts, if any, for which the Architect has withheld or nullified a Certificate for Payment as provided in Section 9.5 of AIA Document A201-1997.
§ 5.1.7 The progress payment amount determined in accordance with Section 5.1.6 shall be further modified under the following circumstances:
.1 Add, upon Substantial Completion of the Work, a sum sufficient to increase the total payments to the full amount of the Contract Sum, less such amounts as the Architect shall determine for incomplete Work, retainage applicable to such work and unsettled claims; and
(Section 9.8.5 of AIA Document A201-1997 requires release of applicable retainage upon Substantial Completion of Work with consent of surety, if any.)
.2 Add, if final completion of the Work is thereafter materially delayed through no fault of the Contractor, any additional amounts payable in accordance with Section 9.10.3 of AIA Document A20 1-1997.
§ 5.1.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage, if any, shall be as follows:
(If it is intended, prior to Substantial Completion of the entire Work, to reduce or limit the retainage resulting from the percentages inserted in Sections 5.1.6.1 and 5.1, 6.2 above, and this is not explained elsewhere in the Contract Documents, insert here provisions for such reduction or limitation.)
Reduce retainage to 5% upon substantial completion as approved by both Owner and Architect.
§ 5.1.9 Except with the Owner’s prior approval, the Contractor shall not make advance payments to suppliers for materials or equipment which have not been delivered and stored at the site.
§ 5.2 FINAL PAYMENT
§ 5.2.1 Final payment, constituting the entire unpaid balance of the Contract Sum, shall be made by the Owner to the Contractor when:
.1 the Contractor has fully performed the Contract except for the Contractor’s responsibility to, correct Work as provided in Section l2.22 of AIA Document A201-l997, and to satisfy other requirements, if any, which extend beyond final payment; and
.2 a final Certificate for Payment has been issued by the Architect.
§ 5.2.2 The Owner’s final payment to the Contractor shall be made no later than 30 days after the issuance of the Architect’s final Certificate for Payment, or as follows:
ARTICLE 6 TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION
§ 6.1 The Contract may be terminated by the Owner or the Contractor as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A20l-1997.
§ 6.2 The Work may be suspended by the Owner as provided in Article 14 of AIA Document A201-1997.
4
ARTICLE 7 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
§ 7.1 Where reference is made in this Agreement to a provision of AIA Document A201-1997 or another Contract Document, the reference refers to that provision as amended or supplemented by other provisions of the Contract Documents.
§ 7.2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located.
(Insert rate of interest agreed upon. if any.)
(Usury laws and requirements under the Federal Truth in Lending Act, similar state and local consumer credit laws and other regulations at the Owner’s and Contractor’s principal places of business, the location of the Project and elsewhere may affect the validity of this provision. Legal advice should be obtained with respect to deletions or modifications and also regarding requirements such as written disclosures or waivers.)
§ 7.3 The Owner’s representative is:
(Name, address and other information)
David Proctor
First Community Bank
P.0. Box 64
Lexington, SC 29071
§ 7.4 The Contractor’s representative is:
(Name, address and other information)
Tim Floyd
Summerfield Associates, Inc.
P.0. Box 5815
West Columbia, SC 29171
§ 7.5 Neither the Owner’s nor the Contractor’s representative shall be changed without ten days written notice to the other party.
§ 7.6 Other provisions:
ARTICLE 8 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
§ 8.1 The Contract Documents, except for Modifications issued after execution of this Agreement, are enumerated as follows:
§ 8.1.1 The Agreement is this executed 1997 edition of the Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor, AIA Document A 101-1997.
§ 8.1.2 The General Conditions are the 1997 edition of the General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A20 1-1997.
5
§ 8.1.3 The Supplementary and other Conditions of the Contract are those contained in the Project Manual dated and are as follows
|
Document |
|
Title |
|
Pages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifications |
|
Dated April 25, 2005 |
|
|
|
§ 8.1.4 The Specifications are those contained in the Project Manual dated as in Section 8.1.3, and are as follows:
(Either list the Specifications here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.)
|
Section |
|
Title |
|
Pages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifications |
|
Dated April 25, 2005 |
|
|
|
§ 8.1.5 The Drawings are as follows, and are dated unless a different date is shown below:
(Either list the Drawings here or refer to an exhibit attached to this Agreement.)
|
Number |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
See attached - Exhibit “A”
§ 8.1.6 The Addenda, if any, are as follows:
|
Number |
|
Date |
|
Pages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
May 4, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
May 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
May 9, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
May 11, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
May 13, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
May 17, 2005 |
|
|
|
Portions of Addenda relating to bidding requirements are not part of the Contract Documents unless the bidding requirements are also enumerated in this Article 8.
§ 8.17 Other documents, if any, forming part of the Contract Documents are as follows:
(List here any additional documents that are intended to form part of the Contract Documents. AIA Document A201-1997 provides that bidding requirements such as advertisement or invitation to bid, Instructions to Bidders, sample forms and the Contractors’ bid are not part of the Contract Documents unless enumerated in this Agreement. They should be listed here only if intended to be part of the Contract Documents.)
6
This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year first written above and is executed in at least three original copies, of which one is to be delivered to the Contractor, one to the Architect for use in the administration of the Contract, and the remainder to the Owner.
|
First Community Bank |
Summerfield Associates, Inc. | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
OWNER (Signature) |
CONTRACTOR (Signature) | ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
David K. Proctor, SVP |
|
T.R. Floyd, President |
|
|
(Printed name and title) |
(Printed name and title) | ||
CAUTQN: You should sign an original AIA Contract Document, on which this text appears in RED. An original assures that changes will not be obscured.
General SA Contractors
Summerfield Associates, Inc.
315 DREHER ROAD, P.O. BOX 5815
WEST COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29171
(803) 791-5035
Fax 796-1651
7
June 27, 2005
Mr. David Proctor
First Community Bank
P. O Box 64
Lexington, SC 29071
|
Re: |
First Community Bank |
|
|
Administration Center |
|
|
Lexington, SC |
|
|
SA Project # 05-048 |
Dear Derek:
In reference to our previous letter of June 20, 2005 and project base bid, please find listed below a recap of allowances and sub pricing for the revised contract price for the project:
|
|
|
Base bid for project |
|
$ |
3,436,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Recap of allowances, adds, and deducts: |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1) |
|
Landscaping allowance — reduce by $20,000.00 per David’s budget quote of $35,000.00 to $40,000.00. |
|
$ |
<20,000.00 |
> |
|
2) |
|
Change acoustical ceiling tiles from USO Eclipse to USO Astro Aegis Climaplus (per samples submitted) for a deduct of |
|
$ |
<6,147.00 |
> |
|
3) |
|
HYAC — VAV box redesign for a deduct of |
|
$ |
<4,279.00 |
> |
|
4) |
|
Change toilet partitions from phenolic resin material with stainless steel hardware to plastic laminate material with chrome plated cast alloy hardware for a deduct of |
|
$ |
<2,001.00 |
> |
|
5) |
|
Use particle core wood doors in lieu of stave core for a deduct of |
|
$ |
<2,700.00 |
> |
|
6) |
|
Add — Change from 2” to 4” poly iso insulation — Add |
|
$ |
7,458.00 |
|
|
7) |
|
Deduct for painting in lieu of wall covering in expansion/future areas per attached for a deduct of |
|
$ |
<2,350,00 |
> |
|
8) |
|
Add for structural steel per revised drawings |
|
$ |
16,893.00 |
|
8
I, Michael C. Crapps, Chief Executive Officer and President, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Community Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: August 12, 2005 |
|
By: |
/s/ Michael C. Crapps |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael C. Crapps | |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Exhibit 31.2
I, Joseph G. Sawyer, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Community Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: August 12, 2005 |
|
By: |
/s/ Joseph G. Sawyer |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph G. Sawyer | |
|
|
|
|
Principal Accounting and Chief Financial Officer | |
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of First Community Corporation (the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:
1. The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
/s/ Michael C. Crapps |
| |
|
|
|
Michael C. Crapps | ||
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
|
|
|
August 12, 2005 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph G. Sawyer |
| |
|
|
|
Joseph G. Sawyer | ||
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer | ||
|
|
|
August 12, 2005 | ||